By June 2017, the Executive Yuan had requested that authorities businesses loosen up restrictions on similar-sex couples, to entitle them to rights accorded to married couples, similar to signing medical consent varieties, asking for family care depart and visiting imprisoned companions. As a result of the ruling, the Legislative Yuan could simply amend the existing marriage laws to include same-intercourse couples, thereby granting them the identical rights loved by married opposite-sex couples, or it might elect to move a brand new law recognizing same-sex marriages or civil partnerships however giving mentioned couples only a few of the rights attributed to marriage. On 16 October 2016, Jacques Picoux, a lecturer at the National Taiwan University, died after falling from the tenth floor of his Taipei house block; mates believed he had taken his personal life due to lack of similar-sex marriage rights. On 23 February 2016, the Referendum Review Committee (行政院公民投票審議委員會) rejected a proposal put forward by the Faith and Hope League on the grounds that it failed to satisfy necessities. Chairman of the committee, Wang Kao-cheng, stated it was rejected for two causes: one, that the proposed was not a law, a legislative precept, vital policy or constitutional amendment and due to this fact didn’t meet the necessities of the Referendum Act (Chinese: 公民投票法); and two, the proposal was about revising several provisions of the Civil Code, which didn’t meet the regulation’s requirement that a referendum should be a couple of single subject.
If the amendment had handed the committee stage, it could have then been voted on at the plenary session of the Legislative Yuan in 2015. The modification, known as the “marriage equality amendment”, would have inserted gender-impartial phrases in the Civil Code changing ones that implied heterosexual couples. The proposal would have amended the Civil Code by stating that “husband and spouse relationships, consanguinity and the principles of human relations can’t be amended except the public agrees through a referendum”. Had it been approved, the legalization of same-sex marriage would have solely been doable via a referendum. Because the legalization of same-sex marriage in Taiwan on May 24, 2019, partnership registration is no longer out there to Taiwanese couples and couples consisting of a Taiwanese national and a citizen of a rustic or territory the place similar-sex marriage is authorized. Deputy Minister of the Interior Chen Chwen-jing introduced in May 2020 that the Ministry of the Interior was prone to abolish the partnership registration system in the close to future, noting that many couples had transformed their partnership into marriage by that point and that the system “effectively served no goal anymore”. On 28 June 2015, a senior official from the Ministry of Justice said that same-intercourse marriage would remain illegal in Taiwan “for now”.
As well as, a separate modification legalizing similar-sex marriage was also introduced by the third-celebration New Power Party (NPP) caucus. The proposed amendment was principally supported by DPP legislators (whose get together had a majority within the Legislative Yuan) though additionally by one legislator from the minority KMT, which was divided on the problem of same-intercourse marriage. In October 2017, Premier Lai Ching-te said that the federal government “will not be giving up its effort to current a proposal earlier than the top of the 12 months to legalize similar-intercourse marriage”. In September 2017, activists protested in Hualien and Taitung counties for the opening of registration providers for identical-intercourse couples. Despite some division throughout the occasion on the issue, DPP’s victorious presidential candidate for the January 2016 election, Tsai Ing-wen, introduced her support for identical-intercourse marriage in November 2015. She was the primary major get together candidate to precise assist for same-sex marriage. On 29 October, President Tsai Ing-wen reaffirmed her help for same-sex marriage. In response to the ruling, Cabinet spokesman Hsu Kuo-yung mentioned that the Executive Yuan would draft a proposal for revising the legal guidelines, though had not but decided whether to amend the Civil Code to include similar-sex couples within the definition of marriage or create a separate and distinct law particularly addressing same-intercourse marriages.
Purpose Judged the statutory ban on similar-sex marriage in Taiwan’s Civil Code as unconstitutional. In 2003, the Executive Yuan proposed legislation opening marriage to same-sex couples, but the bill was rejected in 2006 and was not passed into legislation because of majority opposition from legislators, which included each members of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Kuomintang (KMT). Around the identical time, President Ma Ying-jeou, chairman of the governing Kuomintang, restated his respect for LGBT rights but mentioned that public support was wanted earlier than the government may approve a same-intercourse marriage law. In 2012, Su Tseng-chang, chairman of the Democratic Progressive Party, expressed help for same-sex marriage. On 28 October 2015, the Taichung City Government introduced that very same-sex couples could be permitted to participate in the next year’s mass wedding ceremony ceremony. In March 2017, the total panel of the Constitutional Court (Judicial Yuan) heard a case introduced by gay rights activist Chi Chia-wei (whose attempt at registering a marriage along with his companion in 2013 was rejected) and the Taipei City Government’s Department of Civil Affairs. In October 2015, similar-sex couples were allowed to participate at the Taoyuan City Government’s public mass wedding ceremony for the primary time. On 18 March 2016, the Changhua County Government declared that primarily based on respect and tolerance for similar-intercourse couples, Changhua County had determined to open registration for identical-sex couples.